akiernox_ocasey@hotmail.com
Re: Ogham Fews
Aicerno OCathasaigh
akiernox_ocasey@hotmail.com
Tue May  4 11:45:21 1999
Searles wrote,*br*: The correct order is:*br*:*br*: 1. Beith*br*: 2. Luis*br*: 3. Fearn*br*: 4. Saile*br*: 5. Nuin*br*:*br*: This is the way they are listed in the Book of Ballymote and *br*: the "Scholar's Primer."  This is the way I list *br*: them as well and they make more sense this way... but that *br*: would be a long involved explanation that could take weeks..*br*:*br*: Searles*br*:<snip>*p*Go raibh maith agat Searles. If that's the correct order, when did the other variations start appearring? Is that a recent phenomenon?*br*I must agree that it does make sense in that order, although, from a technical point of view, it would make more sense if Nuin was third (as taken from "Beith-Luis-Nuin"). As for the long involved explanations, I happen to love those kind. *G*. *p*Aicerno
Re: Ogham Fews
Searles
452
Sun May  2 23:15:26 1999